Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Return to Shutterbug Strasse


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Eh?

128.12.131.130

Posted on March 10, 2001 at 23:12:23
Keith
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Pacific NW
Joined: September 29, 1999
Hey, not to be a party pooper, but other than just being another cool place to hang out with fellow AA inmates, it'll be hard to compete against www.photo.net.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
Re: Eh?, posted on March 10, 2001 at 23:47:24
Rod M
Web Geek

Posts: 16281
Location: So. California
Joined: March 1, 1999
Contributor
  Since:
March 1, 1999
Well, the idea was really just to serve the common interests of the inmates. As a photo buff, I'm biased. Maybe I should look at photo.net?

 

photo.net?, posted on March 11, 2001 at 01:26:34
jj
It's good for consumer advice and chitchat. It's not particularly digicam friendly, and this is, I think, supposed to be a digicam forum.

It has an audiophile rant or two on it, as well.
JJ

 

Re: photo.net?, posted on March 11, 2001 at 05:02:29
Keith
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Pacific NW
Joined: September 29, 1999
Well, hey, I'm not partial to either. I love the AA community, and I actually rarely participate at Photo.net.

It's not "consumer-advice"... there are actually A LOT of pros there, but they do help out the beginner. What I really like out of the photo.net site is that there is more composition and "where to get the best light, best location, etc." talk than equipment stuff, and they have a weekly ranking of the best pictures, etc.

Although there are a lot of traditionalists there, I'm sure they do have a lot on digital cameras. The lead author, Phil Greenspun, uses the Canon D-30 digital SLR nowadays. They also have a ton of information there on professional digitization of pictures, digital printing, etc.

Enjoy!
Keith

 

'Scuse me?, posted on March 11, 2001 at 12:51:13
jj
Photo.net has the BEST "where to buy" section I know of. If that's not consumer advice, nothing is.

I have found their digital section to be a bit, well, specialized I guess is the right word.

Btw, Phil IS photo.net. Lead author, too, maybe.
JJ

 

Re: 'Scuse me?, posted on March 11, 2001 at 16:48:14
Keith
Audiophile

Posts: 16
Location: Pacific NW
Joined: September 29, 1999
Hi JJ,

Sorry, I misunderstood. I meant "not consumer advice" as that they also have a ton of very knowledgable professionals that participate in the forums, and for a long time now I've been reading the posts on more composition and picture critiques than "where to buy". I agree it's definitely a very valuable site for those starting out as well.

Phil does not write all that much anymore. I remember when that site used to be all just about his travel journals. Nowadays it's more about the readers who post -- but then again, I'm sure others get other things out of that site. For me, it's like a Photoasylum, largely because all I go for are those daily posts.

sorry for the confusion,
Keith

 

Ahh., posted on March 11, 2001 at 18:47:31
jj
I find my taste more in line with some of the other critique forums, personally.

But it is huge and active, there is no doubt.

I think this is supposed to be digicam, if anything. We shall see. We ought to make an FAQ. You willing to make an article about where to look for stuff like "what store to visit" and so on, and where to find equiment reviews?

I suspect you may be more up on that than I am, I tend mostly to critique forms.
JJ

 

Page processed in 0.017 seconds.