Wine Asylum

Please prove your claim, Mr. Kuller

131.107.0.106


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  All  Email ] [ Wine Asylum ]

When you say:But forced-choice blind listening *always* removes small differences.

you take upon yourself the entire burden of proof. As many people, myself included, have run listening tests in which very small differences were in fact distinguished, your claim is, in fact, falsified.

If you want to rehabilitate your claim, you will need to show the error in many tests, from Fletcher's to the present day.

To the reader: There is no evidence whatsoever, in any way, shape, or form, that "But forced-choice blind listening *always* removes small differences." In fact, the opposite appears to be true from all of the serious refereed work.


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):   Forgot Password?
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)   Eat Me
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
E-mail Replies:   Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  All  Email ] [ Wine Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]