Wine Asylum

The Wine Asylum, the leading Internet destination devoted to the enjoyment of wine.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Please prove your claim, Mr. Kuller

Posted by real_jj on April 4, 2006 at 14:36:53:
When you say:But forced-choice blind listening *always* removes small differences.
you take upon yourself the entire burden of proof. As many people, myself included, have run listening tests in which very small differences were in fact distinguished, your claim is, in fact, falsified.
If you want to rehabilitate your claim, you will need to show the error in many tests, from Fletcher's to the present day.
To the reader: There is no evidence whatsoever, in any way, shape, or form, that "But forced-choice blind listening *always* removes small differences." In fact, the opposite appears to be true from all of the serious refereed work.