 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Well: posted by Vinylly on March 18, 2004 at 09:51:49:
It was fun while it lasted. Let's face it, the D-Lux is a very expensive little toy. For about $300.00 less you can get the same camera without the red dot and fancy presentation boxing. It's called the Panasonic DMC -F1. As 'What Digital Camera' said in it's Buying Guide, 'stylish and easy to use' giving it an 84/100 rating.
However, for just $150.00 more then the price of the D-Lux, I finally settled on the new Olympus C-8080. It was the winner in it's catagory at the 2004 DIMA Digital Camera Shoot-Out based on the overall quality of the digital print and the accuracy of color.
Now all I have to do is fiddle around with it and get accustomed to using it. One negative I'm having difficulty with is that it moves too fast between wide angle and telephoto, so it's difficult to get it right where you want it.
Other then that, the 8"X 12" color photos around the neighborhood are incredible.
Follow Ups:
Was the image quality of the D-lux sub par? It would be nice to have a 'take anyware' point and shoot.
The Leica D-Lux is nothing more then a Panasonic DMC-F1 with a fancier casing but way overpriced. Nice little point-and-shoot, though. But, after taking it out on extended trips I felt the color to be 'washed out'. This was particularly noticeable when comparing the same images taken with the Oly 8080, which actually is only a bit more expensive. If you want good point and shoots, you would probably be better off with Canons or Casios, both getting very high reviews.
| Register / Login |
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
