![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.98.175.238
In Reply to: Exposure question posted by Hergest Ridge on March 9, 2006 at 01:52:15:
...when it seems to me the simplest solution lies elsewhere.HTML tag not allowed
Follow Ups:
I said ND filter so.....
![]()
...I basically said I think the real solution is to take such a picture when the light is different or it is a in different relationship to the sun so that you don't have to labor in the post-production environment to save it.This insight derives from my work as a filmmaker. We try to avoid shooting exteriors with the camera looking toward the bright part of the sun and shooting in harsh, high contrast, mid-day light.
![]()
I asked in my original post if i was simply trying to do something that couldn't be done given the light situation. I was hoping that the software built in to digital cameras might proveide some kind of workaround that i wasn't aware of or that there might be another solution. Joes suggestion of a graduated neutral density filter seems a sensible solution and one which enables me to use the camera in difficult situations.
...of course that's fine, but if it's relatively easy to wait or reposition such a thing as a car for a situation better suited to a photograph, then I'd say that's the avenue of least resistance.
![]()
Paul didn't have access to a dozen Gaffers & grips to hold scrims and 5k's.Yes, I held an I.A.T.S.E. Stagehand union card.
When you can't sit around all day playing cards waiting for that perfect angle. You have to find the right tools, agree?
![]()
...I'm a documentary filmmaker and we don't use the kind of large crews you're talking about.
![]()
Why all the apparent resentment at the suggestion of adjusting the shooting strategy? It's completely obvious that if it's a situation where you CAN'T control the light then you have to deal with it in "post."But the photo in question was one that could have been handled in a number of different ways; at least it appears so on the surface. A photo where that sort of control is not possible is another matter.
As my initial foray into this forum has been rather unpleasant, I think I'll go away now...
![]()
I reviewed the original post and there was nothing there suggesting that an alternate shooting setup wasn't practical.
![]()
markets in which to appy our trades. Than the majority of shooters here. Thus my simpler answers.
![]()
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: