![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
104.60.189.213
In Reply to: RE: Cheapest wines win again... posted by mkuller on November 15, 2017 at 11:07:17
And to each his own.
But, when you're tasting are you just going with first impressions? Do these wines have any layers that reveal themselves as the tasting progresses?
And I'm not defending the Bordeaux. Many of the current French wines are starting to imitate California, Australia, Chilean, etc. Fruit forward and lack of complexity.
I've had the Freak Show, the Cypher (maybe not the vintage), and I've had some Niner. IMO, initial sip is all that the wine is going to offer.
Follow Ups:
...over the 60 to 90 minutes we're tasting them, even the ones that have been decanted for an hour first.
As I've said before, in blind tastings like this, the winners tend to be fruity and very drinkable now, rather than complex with other layers to come out with bottle aging.
We also taste them with bread and cheese snacks, sometimes some salami, but not with meals.
The two winners were fruity but also the most balanced with no off tastes. I liked the Niner from the beginning and thought the Freakshow was fruity and one note initially, but it got a little better.
I brought the Burrell School which I thought was more complex, but it didn't hold up as well.
The French wine had good ratings and the guy who brought it was very surprised as he drinks mostly French and Italian wines - he also rated it last and was pretty in line with the other tasters.
Get a group together and try a blind tasting and you'll see how much you love fruit bombs, too.
You know, like Bedrock, Turley and Seghesio.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: