|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
This photo is a semi-finalist in photopoint million-dollar moment context. Look at he moment in the stars suggesting extremely long exposure, yet the comet, tree and the man are stand-still.
Follow Ups:
This is a collage of two fotos.
Take a camera and compose the scene, but donīt light the fire. Make a long exposure, for the sky with stars; then, cover the lens, and make a bonfire, with that man by it; uncover the lens, expose for that scene and, presto! thatīs it.That wandering star, or comet, may well be a bonus. Unless the photographer was waiting for it to happen (if Iīm not wrong, the Earthīs encounter with the Cephaeids is in July, or so; Summertime anyhow), and then included the bonfire. And thereīs no reason for it to go with starīs apparent movement.
Regards
BF
Seeing the stars move, while the person remains stationary, is at least consistant. If the fire had more detail we could see if it was "smoothed out" like it would be from the exposure suggested by the stars.The light on the tree looks "long".
But, I can't say for sure, I'm not a forensic analyst.
JJ
Movement in the stars suggest several minutes long exposure, fire, light on the tree and the man suggest few seconds exposure. Obviously, the man is overexposed. If the exposure was several mins, fire should be a blob lacking the shape definition. Shouldn't the comet also move on the horizon in the same direction as the stars? That is confusing to me.Adi
You might not be able to see the comet's motion. The light on the tree is ok for the exposure, but the fire isn't as burnt out as I expect.It's hard to tell.
JJ
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: