Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Opinions needed on Purchase of new digital camera to photograph tubes.

Posted by pictureguy on April 30, 2012 at 00:23:02:
RAW is nice, but can have a steep learning curve.
Does Photoshop Elements have a raw convertor?
I shoot RAW/JPG simultaniously and while it burns memory, also lets me compare images easily. I also have a 'batch conversion' set up in Photoshop.

But, no matter which system you settle on (Workflow, in photo terms) you should work on getting a calibration system for your monitor.
I use an inexpensive HUEY system and Gutenprint drivers for my Epson printer. My printer output is nearly an exact match for what I see on the screen.....And Do Not forget that the screen is an RGB system and that printers are CMYK, so matching can sometimes be a pain.