Wine Asylum

The Wine Asylum, the leading Internet destination devoted to the enjoyment of wine.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Whose wine judgement do you trust...

Posted by mkuller on September 30, 2009 at 20:52:22:
...there are two big names in wine tasting - Robert Parker, The Wine Advocate and James Laube of Wine Spectator - both with their 100 point scales which are so influential as to change the styles of wine being produced.

So you don't want to support them, or don't agree with them, where do you go for impartial wine judging?

Maybe the regional and state competitions?

"A recent study of U.S. wine competitions has caused some consternation among competition organizers. The analysis by Robert T. Hodgson, published in the Journal of Wine Economics, found little consistency in the results of 13 competitions in 2003. Hodgson, a retired Humboldt State professor, found that of the roughly 2,400 wines entered in more than three competitions, 47 percent received at least one gold medal, but 98 percent of those same wines received no medal or a bronze â€” awarded to wines that are just above average â€” in at least one other competition. Hodgson concludes that "winning a gold medal is greatly influenced by chance alone."

The Los Angeles Times quoted the chairman of the Los Angeles County Fair's huge wine competition as calling the conclusion "hogwash." Robert Small defended the quality of his competition's judges and the results they reach.

I've judged a number of wine competitions, and Hodgson's analysis doesn't surprise me. I agree that the best competitions generally have high-caliber judges. But judges at many competitions are asked to evaluate more than 100 wines in a day. Palate fatigue invariably sets in. It's easy to see how a well-made wine could slip through the cracks or a less-than-stellar bottle could end up with a gold medal.

Wineries pay hefty fees to enter their wines, hoping for some recognition that will help them market their wines. Consumers would be well-advised to take any gold medal with a grain of salt."