|
Shutterbug Strasse A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Re: I would let it go
Posted by Romy on March 27, 2001 at 19:17:34:
*** The Camera and most of the lenses have too much personal value (all of it passed along to me by my father) to let them go.
I know what you feel. Approximately 10 years I made a creasy observation that among any camera lines there are the models that are capable to sponge the “spirit†of the users. You call it “personal value†I call it differently. I considered that those cameras were so brilliantly designed (requirements/functionality/implementation balance) that those cameras itself become a spiritual asset which was able to communicate with the surrounding. Most of the time they are properly build (my buddy John Curl should have hard attack right here…) with no extra functionalities and properly applied in the market (What the connection!) mechanical cameras. For example, to me they would be: Nikon FM, FM-2 (look: not F3…why?), Pentax’s K-1000, Minolta’s entire old “G†7 line, Olympus OM-1, Canon F-1, practically all 4x5 and 8x10 cameras, most of the German Nazis cameras, Dresden’s Practical TL, Russian old Horizon, strangely practically non among the medium format except the old 220 or 330 twins…
Pretend you father left for you a worm-plastic supper-digital-gismo…Those cameras are excellent but… I do not thing it would survive the first trade show… no “personal valueâ€. (perhaps some audio “designer†should think about it)
Unfortunately for you, the Canon doses not keep compliance between its newer and older optics…
Romy the Cat