Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I would let it go

Posted by Romy on March 27, 2001 at 15:55:28:
Rich, generally Canon at FTBâ€™s time (pre-FD optics) did not produce the optics worth to keep now. (They had some but not the one you mentioned). If it is important to you as memory of your younghood or as a gift from people who are not with you anymore then you may keep it. Photographically it is not interesting and I would suggest let it go. Now, when the digital it taking over the photography the values or those mechanical cameras going doing very dramatically unless they are REAL serious...
The Cat